USPTO serial 73538208
PROMT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1636684Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 5, 1991
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROMT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MULGRAVE, VICTORIA, AU
VARIAN AUSTRALIA PROPRIETARY LTD.
MULGRAVE, VICTORIA, AU
PALO ALTO, CA
SANTA CLARA, CA
MULGRAVE, VICTORIA, AU
MULGRAVE, VICTORIA, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ESTER MARTIN MAILLARO
ESTER MARTIN MAILLARO HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749ATTN: TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDENVER, CO 80201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ATOMIC ABSORPTION/EMISSION SPECTROPHOTOMETER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VARIAN TECHTRON PTY. LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by VARIAN AUSTRALIA PROPRIETARY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by VARIAN INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VARIAN TECHTRON PTY. LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by VARIAN TECHTRON PTY. LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PROMT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2002 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 15, 2002 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 11, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |