Drawing for ELEKTA

USPTO serial 73539306

ELEKTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ELEKTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010NEUROSURGICAL INSTRUMENTSABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 1989ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 1988CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 10, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 22, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 22, 1987CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 2, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 30, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 29, 1986CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 8, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 8, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 31, 1986CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 12, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 31, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 5, 1985CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 2, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance