USPTO serial 73540406
ULTRA MIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRA MIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES F. MCKEOWN
JAMES F MCKEOWN ANTONELLI, TERRY & WANDSSTE 6001919 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ULTRASONIC HUMIDIFIERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |