USPTO serial 73544104
CHARFUEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHARFUEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEE G. MEYER
LEE G MEYER10487 E IDA AVEENGLEWOOD, CO 80111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | COAL-DERIVED FUEL SYSTEMS AND FUEL COMPOSITIONS CONSISTING OF A SOLID/LIQUID FLUIDIC SLURRY WHEREIN THE SOLID IS A PARTICULATE DERIVED FROM PYROLYSIS OF COAL AND THE LIQUID IS THE PYROLYSIS LIQUID DERIVED FROM PYROLYSIS OF COAL, WHICH SYSTEMS AND COMPOSITIONS CAN BE USED AS A FUEL IN INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES AND AS A REFINERY FEEDSTOCK IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CHEMICALS | ABANDONED | Dec 3, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1987 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 29, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 7, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |