USPTO serial 73544162
VENETO MODA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VENETO MODA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | CERTIFICATION MARK AS USED BY PERSONS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICANT, CERTIFIES ALL WORK AND LABOR ON THE GOODS IS PERFORMED BY MEMBERS OF APPLICANT AND THEY CERTIFY THE QUALITY AND STANDARD OF THE GOODS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 19, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |