USPTO serial 73545685
ARGUS TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARGUS TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | SALES AND MARKETING OF COMPUTER AND SOLID STATE CONTROLLED TECHNOLOGIES WHICH ARE ENERGY, COMMUNICATIONS OR AGRICULTURALLY ORIENTED SPECIFICALLY, THE MARK IS USED IN SALES AND MARKETING ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH A COMPUTER PROCESSOR CONTROL SYSTEM WHICH MONITORS AND REGULATES ELECTRONIC POWER FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES TO INSURE EFFICIENT USE OF ENERGY; A COMPUTER DIRECTED TOTAL CONTROL DEVICE FOR FURNANCES WHICH MONITORS AND ADJUST THE FLAME TEMPERATURE, FAN OPERATIONS, AND THERMOSTATIC SETTINGS, AND A DECORATIVE HEATING DEVICE COVERED WITH STEEL CANVAS ON WHICH A DESIGN HAS BEEN PRINTED, WHICH DEVICE ACTS AS A SPACE HEATER FOR OFFICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |