USPTO serial 73547896
LE CORDON BLEU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 13, 2006
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with LE CORDON BLEU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PARIS, FR
PARIS, FR
LE CORDON BLEU INTERNATIONAL B.V.
Amsterdam, NL
HOEKENRODE 6-8, NL
HOEKENRODE 6-8, NL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | [PHOTOGRAPHS; ADHESIVE FOR STATIONERY OR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES AND FOR BINDING BOOKS; PAINT BRUSHES; TYPEWRITERS; PAPER CUTTERS;] [ PLAYING CARDS; ] [PRINTERS' TYPE; PRINTING BLOCKS; BOOKS, NEWSPAPERS, REVIEWS,] ADVERTISING LEAFLETS OF GENERAL INTEREST AND CULINARY TOPICS; COOKING INSTRUCTION LEAFLETS, BROCHURES; [AND RECIPE CARDS, PLASTIC BAGS FOR COOKING AND HOUSEHOLD USE; WRAPPING PAPER;] [ NOTE BOOKS AND PAPE PADS; ] PENS; [AND PENCILS;] BALL POINT [AND FOUNTAIN] PENS [ ; CALENDARS; DAILY SCHEDULES; EXERCISE BOOKS; PAPER NAPKINS; PAPER TABLE-CLOTHS; PAPER HAND TOWELS; CARDBOARD CARTONS AND BOXES; PAPER WATER FILTERS; INSULATING WRAPPERS AND BAGS FOR STORING AND MIXING FOOD] | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | [KITCHEN AND HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE; MIRRORS, PICTURE FRAMES] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | [BED COVERS, TABLE CLOTHS; COVERS FOR TABLE-TOP KITCHEN APPLIANCES, NAMELY, MICROWAVE OVENS, TOASTERS, BLENDERS; BED CLOTHES, NAMELY, SHEETS, PILLOW CASES AND BLANKETS;] TOWELS [; TEXTILE NAPKINS] AND DISH CLOTHS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RENAUD COINTREAU & CIE
- Other trademarks owned by RENAUD COINTREAU & CIE
- Other trademarks owned by LE CORDON BLEU INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by LE CORDON BLEU B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by LE CORDON BLEU B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named LE CORDON BLEU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 15, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 15, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2012 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 16, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 1991 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 1990 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |