USPTO serial 73548252
MOBILE-FAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURKE, MICHAEL J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOBILE-FAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INFORMATION COLLECTION SYSTEM, COMPRISED OF VEHICLE OR PRODUCTION MACHINERY SIGNAL COLLECTION AND PROCESSING UNITS, DATA STORAGE MODULES, INFORMATION RETRIEVAL UNITS, AND PAGE PRINTER UNITS, FOR DISPLAYING OF RETRIEVED INFORMATION | ABANDONED | Nov 19, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1992 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1986 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |