USPTO serial 73554445
ACURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN M. BENASSI
JOHN M BENASSI LYON & LYON611 W SIXTH ST34TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RENDERING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE OPERATION OF AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS | ABANDONED | Aug 31, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 28, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 29, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 10, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 1, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 6, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 15, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |