USPTO serial 73555994
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SPARTANBURG, SC
SPARTANBURG, SC
RICHMOND, VA
SPARTANBURG, SC
GLEN ALLEN, VA
GLEN ALLEN, VA
RICHMOND, VA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas L. Moses
Thomas L. Moses Southeast IP Group, LLCP.O. BOX 14156GREENVILLE, SC 29610UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MICRO COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR THE PHARMACY INDUSTRY COMPRISING MICRO COMPUTER, MONITOR, PRINTER, USER MANUAL AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 26, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 31, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |