USPTO serial 73556423
SEALCRETE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEALCRETE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLISON C. COLLARD
ALLISON C COLLARD COLLARD, ROE & GALGANO1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | EXTERNALLY APPLIED COMBINATION METAL PIPE COATING/SEALANT COMPRISING MIXTURE OF HYDRAULICALLY BONDED CEMENT, SAND, AND OTHER ADDITIVES, WITH OR WITHOUT FIBROUS REINFORCEMENT | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | INSULATORY AND PROTECTIVE COATINGS, DRESSINGS AND CLADDINGS COMPRISING A MIXTURE OF HYDRAULICALLY BONDED CEMENT, SAND AND OTHER ADDITIVES, WITH OR WITHOUT FIBROUS REINFORCEMENT, FOR METAL PIPES, CONTAINERS, STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS, BUILDING ELEMENTS AND BUILDINGS, AND FOR USE IN THE REPAIR OF STEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE, AND PROVIDING MECHANICAL AND/OR CORROSIVE PROTECTION | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | HYDRAULICALLY-BOUND BUILDING OR CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL-NAMELY, CEMENT MORTAR, CONCRETE, LIME AND/OR PLASTER, WITH OR WITHOUT FIBROUS REINFORCEMENT; LAMINATED BODIES OF HYDRAULIC AND SYNTHETIC RESIN-BOUND LAYERS IN THE FORM OF PLATES, ESPECIALLY CLADDINGS-PLATES, PIPES, AND MASTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |