USPTO serial 73556591
SUPER-TECH SONY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPER-TECH SONY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SHINAGAWA-KU, TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. G. Horowitz
Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COLOR TELEVISION SETS, VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS AND PLAYERS, VIDEO CAMERAS, RADIOS, AUDIO TAPE RECORDERS, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, COMPACT DISC PLAYERS, PHONOGRAPH RECORD PLAYERS, COMPACT DISC PLAYERS, AMPLIFIERS, TUNERS, CASSETTE TAPE DECKS, LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, VIDEO COMPACT DISC PLAYERS, PARTS THEREFOR, AUDIO AND VIDEO CASSETTE TAPES, COMPACT DISCS AND MICRO FLOPPY DISCS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1990 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 18, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |