USPTO serial 73556938
PITTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHN, DEBBIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PITTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CAPITAL FEDERAL, AR
CAPITAL FEDERAL, AR
CAPITAL FEDERAL, AR
CAPITAL FEDERAL, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SHOES, BELTS, SOCKS, TIGHTS, UNDERWEAR, SWIMSUITS, SWIMSUIT COVER-UPS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SHIRTS, PANTS, SHORTS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, SWEATERS, JACKETS, COATS, HATS, SCARVES, AND GLOVES | ABANDONED | Feb 23, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIEZ, FERNANDO JORGE
- Other trademarks owned by DIEZ, EDUARDO JORGE
- Other trademarks owned by DIEZ, EDUARDO JORGE
- Other trademarks owned by DIEZ, FERNANDO JORGE
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PITTI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |