USPTO serial 73557120
EL TIO PEPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANNON, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EL TIO PEPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EUGENE F. MALIN
EUGENE F MALIN MALIN, HALEY, MCHALE & BARRONSTE #2110ONE FINANCIAL PLZFT LAUDERDALE, FL 33394Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | SPANISH RESTAURANT SERVICES | ABANDONED | Aug 24, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 1989 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |