USPTO serial 73557351
PRESTIGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRESTIGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALVIN FROSS
ALVIN FROSS WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN750 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-2773UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | CUTLERY KNIVES AND CUTLERY MEAT SLICERS, CARVING FORKS AND SHARPENING STEELS; FLATWARE, NAMELY FORKS, SPOONS AND KNIVES; KITCHEN TOOLS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY SWIVEL PEELERS, POTATO MASHERS, STRAINING SPOONS, APPLE CORERS, FOOD TURNERS, LADLES, CAN OPENERS, SPATULAS, PASTRY SERVERS, VEGETABLE CRINKLE CHIP CUTTERS, FOOD WHIPS, KNIFE SHARPENERS, MIXING AND SERVING SPOONS AND SKIMMERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | PASTRY BRUSHES, CORKSCREWS, TEA STRAINERS AND FOOD STRAINERS HANGING RACKS FOR KITCHEN TOOLS AND WHISKS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |