Drawing for ROOFERS MART

USPTO serial 73557463

ROOFERS MART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROOFERS MART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LORIN M. KLEEGER

LORIN M KLEEGER HENDRICK, SPANOS & PHILLIPS1410 PEACHTREE CTR TWR230 PEACHTREE ST N WATLANTA, GA 30303

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RENDERING SPECIALIZED MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF INDEPENDENTLY OWNED WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES INVOLVED IN THE SALE OF ROOFING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND SUPPLIESABANDONEDFeb 23, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 1989ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Mar 17, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 15, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 15, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 19, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 6, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 26, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 3, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance