USPTO serial 73557738
COOKS TOOLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COOKS TOOLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BERNARD MALINA
BERNARD MALINA MALINA & WOLSON60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | SPOONS, FORKS, SPATULAS, KITCHEN KNIVES, GARLIC PRESSES, EGG SLICERS, CHEESE SLICERS, GRAVY LADLES, POT SCRAPERS, GRAVY SKIMMERS, PIZZA CUTTERS, PIE SLICE LIFTERS, BISCUIT CUTTERS, SERVING TONGS, SALAD SCISSORS, ONION DICERS, FOOD CHOPPERS, VEGETABLE PEELERS, HONEY SERVERS, SOUP LADLES, CAKE CUTTER, ICE TONGS, METAL PIE CRIMPERS AND BARBEQUE UTENSILS, NAMELY TONGS, FORKS, SPATULAS AND BASTING BRUSHES SOLD AS A UNIT | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | KITCHEN SCALES, FREEZER/REFRIGERATOR THERMOMETERS, MAGNETIC HOOKS AND DECORATIVE MAGNETS | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | EGG POACHERS, MEASURING CUPS, PASTRY BRUSHES, BASTING BRUSHES, SUGAR SHAKERS, CAKE PANS, CAKE AND BROILING RACKS, BROILER PANS, VEGETABLE STEAM BASKETS, FRENCH FRY BASKETS, SALADS WASHERS CONTAINERS; SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, NON-ELECTRIC BUN WARMERS, CRANK SIFTERS, CUP SIFTERS, ROAST RACKS, UTILITY BOARDS, BUTCHER BLOCKS, COCTAIL STRAINERS, CORKSCREWS, LEMON SQUEEZERS, LIQUID SOAP DISPENSERS, EGG BEATERS, EGG SEPARATORS, CHEESE GRATERS, TEA BALLS, ICE CREAM SCOOPS, BOTTLE OPENERS, JAR OPENERS, PASTRY AND DOUGH WIRE BLENDERS, AND VENETIAN BLIND BRUSH CLEANERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |