USPTO serial 73558144
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
GORDON, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & REZAC708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOY JEWELRY, CHILDREN'S PLAY COSMETICS AND TOY BEAUTY KITS CONTAINING HAIR COMBS, MIRROR, FACIAL TISSUE AND THE LIKE | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |