Drawing for RPS ROADWAY PACKAGE SYSTEM

USPTO serial 73558307

RPS ROADWAY PACKAGE SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1572445Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 19, 1989
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RPS ROADWAY PACKAGE SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SYLVIA A. PETROSKY

SYLVIA A PETROSKY RENNER KENNER GREIVE BOBAK TAYLOR ET AL291 N CLEVELAND-MASSILLON RDSTE 1000AKRON, OH 44333

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039SMALL PACKAGE TRANSPORTATION SERVICESSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMar 11, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 1997C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Apr 21, 1997C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED
Mar 7, 1996C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 21, 1995815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Dec 19, 1989R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 26, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 20, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 12, 1989CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 22, 1989REINREINSTATED
Apr 24, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 6, 1989ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 4, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 28, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 28, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 29, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance