USPTO serial 73558307
RPS ROADWAY PACKAGE SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1572445Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 19, 1989
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RPS ROADWAY PACKAGE SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AKRON, OH
CORAOPOLIS, PA
AKRON, OH
CORAOPOLIS, PA
AKRON, OH
PITTSBURGH, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SYLVIA A. PETROSKY
SYLVIA A PETROSKY RENNER KENNER GREIVE BOBAK TAYLOR ET AL291 N CLEVELAND-MASSILLON RDSTE 1000AKRON, OH 44333Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | SMALL PACKAGE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Mar 11, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROADWAY SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROADWAY PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROADWAY SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROADWAY PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROADWAY SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RPS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named RPS ROADWAY PACKAGE SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1997 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 26, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1989 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |