Drawing for THE COSMOPOLITAN VALENTINE F. MOROZOFF

USPTO serial 73558325

THE COSMOPOLITAN VALENTINE F. MOROZOFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE COSMOPOLITAN VALENTINE F. MOROZOFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD M. PRINCE

EDWARD M PRINCE CUSHMAN, DARBY & CUSHMAN1801 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CHOCOLATE CANDIES, PASTRY AND COOKIES, ICE CREAM, BREAD, BISCUITS, CAKES, FRUIT-ICE, COFFEE, TEA, COCOA AND SUGARABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 1988ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
Apr 19, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 28, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 28, 1988EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 15, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 2, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 7, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 7, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 1986ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 30, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 30, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance