USPTO serial 73558377
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
GUADALAJARA, JALISCO, MX
GUADALAJARA, JALISCO, MX
GUADALAJARA, JALISCO, MX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN K. LEFLER
MANUEL VILLAGOMEZ RODRIGUEZ MANUEL FERNANDEZ OKELVIN NO 8 DESP 601COL ANZURESMEXICO, DF, 11590| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | TOSTADAS, CORN CHIPS, FLOUR AND CORN TORTILLAS, TORTILLAS FOR BUNS AND TORTILLAS FOR PIZZA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 1996 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 17, 1995 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 2, 1992 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 14, 1992 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 9, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |