Drawing for Serial No. 73559098

USPTO serial 73559098

Serial No. 73559098

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 73559098?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES A. LAFF

CHARLES A LAFF LAFF, WHITESEL, CONTE & SARET401 N MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021INTERDENTAL BRUSHESABANDONEDMay 27, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 1987ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Mar 27, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 2, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 15, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 12, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance