Drawing for ROYAL CANADIAN

USPTO serial 73559193

ROYAL CANADIAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROYAL CANADIAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. LYNN PERRY

E LYNN PERRY TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDSTEUART ST TWRONE MARKET PLZSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031FRESH FRUITS, NAMELY, APPLES, PEARS, PLUMS, PEACHES, APRICOTS AND CHERRIESABANDONEDJul 15, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 1989OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Aug 10, 1989ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Aug 10, 1989OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Mar 13, 1989OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Nov 1, 1988PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 1, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 26, 1988CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 1, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 28, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 19, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 1, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 2, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 20, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 11, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 9, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 11, 1986CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 27, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 26, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance