USPTO serial 73559732
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Kanagawa, JP
MINATO-KU, TOKYO 106, JP
MINATO-KU, TOKYO 106, JP
MINATO-KU, TOKYO 106, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian B. Darville
Brian B. Darville Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314-3451United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION EQUIPMENT;, namely, AUTOMATIC CHECKWEIGHERS, AUTOMATIC ELECTRONIC WEIGHING MACHINES; PRICE LABELERS;, namely, AUTOMATIC CHECKWEIGHING, PRICE-COMPUTING AND TICKET-PRINTING MACHINES; [ COMPUTER AIDED CONTROLLERS FOR TURRET PUNCH PRESSES; CONTROLLERS FOR STRAIGHTENING SHAFTS;, namely, ELECTRONIC MEASURING INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING THE BENDING AND STRAIN OF SHAFTS, TELECONTROLLERS; GAUGES; DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT TO DETECT ABNORMAL VIBRATION OF ROTATING MACHINES; TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT;, namely, TELEPHONES, PRIVATE BRANCH EXCHANGES, TRUNK LINE TESTERS, SIGNAL TRANSMISSION MEASURING UNITS, TEST CALL GENERATORS, SUBSCRIBER METER CIRCUIT TESTERS; GAS-PRESSURE REMOTE MONITORS;] CARRIER SIGNAL TRANSMITTERS; OPTO-DIGITAL TRANSMITTERS; TELEMETERING UNITS; HYBRID INTEGRATED CIRCUITS;, namely, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS OTHER THAN MONOLITHIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS [; RADIO COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT;, namely, SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS TERMINALS FOR USE ABOARD SHIPS; LOGIC ANALYZERS; DATA PROCESSING TERMINALS AND PARTS THEREFOR;, namely, MAGNETIC TAPE AND/OR CARD UNITS, FLOPPY DISK DRIVES, PAPER TAPE PUNCHES AND METERS, AND CATHODE RAY TUBE DISPLAYS] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2023 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 5, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 6, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 1, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 18, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | PINT | REPRINTING REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE | — |
| Nov 3, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1990 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 29, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 28, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |