Drawing for LINGUINE ALFREDO

USPTO serial 73560066

LINGUINE ALFREDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SKORO, LINDA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LINGUINE ALFREDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S. HALE

JOHN S HALE GIPPLE & HALE6667-B OLD DOMINION DRMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030LINGUINE SERVED WITH A CLAM SAUCE FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISESABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 1990OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
May 7, 1990ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
May 7, 1990OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Feb 18, 1987OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jan 30, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 30, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 30, 1986PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 1986NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 3, 1986CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 15, 1986CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 4, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 3, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 11, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance