USPTO serial 73560621
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
STAMFORD, CT
STAMFORD, CT
MEXICO, D.F., MX
STAMFORD, CT
STAMFORD, CT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL L. GOLDMAN
MICHAEL L GOLDMANST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSON & REENS986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | FRUIT FLAVORED NON-ALCOHOLIC SOFT DRINK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1995 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 18, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 17, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |