USPTO serial 73560909
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE L. ADAMS
BRUCE L ADAMS ADAMS & WILKS500 FIFTH AVE STE 3200NEW YORK, NY 10110UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SOAPS; AFTER-SHAVE LOTIONS AND CREAMS; SKIN LOTIONS AND CREAMS; HAIR CREAMS, OILS, SETTING LOTIONS, RINSES, SHAMPOOS AND SPRAYS; POMADES; EAU DE COLOGNE; SUN SCREEN CREAMS; PERFUMES AND DENTIFRICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | HANDBAGS; SHOULDER BAGS; BOSTON BAGS; KNAPSACKS; BRIEFCASES; SUITCASES AND LUGGAGE | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | CLOTHING (EXCLUDING SPORTS CLOTHING), TOWELS AND HANDKERCHIEFS | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | MEN'S SUITS, JACKETS, TROUSERS, SHIRTS, SWEATERS AND UNDERWEAR; LADIES' SKIRTS, SWEATERS INCLUDING CARDIGANS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, SPORT, LEISURE AND POLO SHIRTS, COATS INCLUDING OVERCOATS AND RAINCOATS, CLOAKS, UNDERSHIRTS, DRAWERS, SLIPS, PETTICOATS, CORSETS, BRASSIERES, PAJAMAS, NIGHTGOWNS, NEGLIGEES AND HOSIERY; GLOVES INCLUDING RUBBER GLOVES; CUFFS; WRISTLETS; COLLARS; NECKTIES; SHAWLS; MUFFLERS; SCARVES; KERCHIEFS; HEADWEAR -- NAMELY, HATS, CAPS, BONNETS, BERETS, HOODS, AND NIGHT CAPS; SOCKS; AND BATHING SUITS AND CAPS | ABANDONED | — |
| 026 | BAGS, BUTTONS AND BELTS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 26, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |