Drawing for MICROMITE

USPTO serial 73561013

MICROMITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1409149Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 16, 1986
Examiner
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with MICROMITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan A. LaVine

Jordan A. LaVine Flaster/Greenberg P.C.Suite 100, 100 Front StreetConshohocken, PA 19428United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005AGRICULTURAL ACARICIDESACTIVEAug 27, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2026E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Sep 16, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Feb 8, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jul 21, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 17, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Nov 25, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED
Nov 25, 2016RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Nov 25, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Nov 25, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 13, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 16, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Feb 18, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Dec 10, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 5, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 23, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Apr 20, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Apr 6, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Mar 3, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 17, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 14, 2006RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 14, 200689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 4, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Sep 28, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 19, 200689AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED
Jul 19, 2006E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Jul 12, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Nov 18, 1992C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Nov 16, 1992PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15
Sep 28, 1992RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION
Aug 21, 1992PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15
May 4, 1992815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Sep 16, 1986R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 24, 1986PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 1986NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 29, 1986CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 29, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 3, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 31, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance