USPTO serial 73561268
AGRI-GEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AGRI-GEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. RONALD RICHES
C RONALD RICHES COASTAL TRADEMARK SERVICES400 - 601 W CORDOVA STVANCOUVER, BC V6B 1G1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | CORPORATION ORGANIZED PURSUANT TO THE LAWS OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA, A MODULAR INCINERATION PLANT COMPRISING A CONTROLLED AIR INCINERATION SYSTEM HAVING CONVEYORS, PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CRUSHERS, AIR SCREENS AND HYDRAULIC RAM BIN LOADERS WHEREBY THE SYSTEM INSINERATES OF SOLID WASTE AND CONVERTS THE PRODUCTS OF COMBUSTION OF SAID WASTE TO A USEABLE ENERGY FORM NAMELY STEAM, HEAT OR ELECTRICITY, A STEAM TURBINE GENERATOR SET AND AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |