Drawing for ALFREDO SAUCE

USPTO serial 73561411

ALFREDO SAUCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHALLANT, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALFREDO SAUCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S. HALE

JOHN S HALE GIPPLE & HALE6667-B OLD DOMINION DRMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030SAUCES FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISESABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 22, 1990ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Mar 28, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 6, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 20, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 20, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 24, 1988CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
May 4, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 29, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 4, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 26, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 26, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 4, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 14, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance