USPTO serial 73562332
DISTINCTIVE ICE CREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 1987
- Examiner
- OMELKO, NANCY LOU
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DISTINCTIVE ICE CREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE, S.A.
1800 VEVEY, CH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN H. STRASBURGER
JOHN H STRASBURGER SHORT CRESSMAN & BURGESS3000 FIRST INTERSTATE CTR999 THIRD AVESEATTLE, WA 98104-4008Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SNELGROVE ICE CREAM COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by SNELGROVE ICE CREAM COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SNELGROVE ICE CREAM COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by SNELGROVE ICE CREAM, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DISTINCTIVE ICE CREAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jan 27, 1995 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 1, 1994 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 1993 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 2, 1992 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |