USPTO serial 73562914
CRYPTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRYPTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BRUSSELS, BE
BRUSSELS, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD BROWN
DONALD BROWN DIKE, BRONSTEIN, ROBERTS, ET AL130 WATER STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC APPARATUS USED FOR PROCESSING AND TRANSMITTING DATA, TEXT, VOICE AND IMAGES; OFFICE AUTOMATION EQUIPMENT AND THEIR COMPONENTS, NAMELY COMPUTER DISPLAYS, DISK UNITS, PRINTERS AND TERMINALS; ELECTRONIC BANKING APPARATUS, NAMELY COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, ELECTRONIC CASH DISPENSERS AND TERMINALS USED TO FACILITATE ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER; COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS USED TO PRODUCE AND REPRODUCE MICROFILM OR MICROFICHE FROM COMPUTER TAPE OR FROM PAPER; COMPUTER TYPOGRAPHIC CONSOLES; COMPUTER SECURITY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CAMERAS, COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS, USED TO ASSURE THE PROTECTION, CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY OF COMPUTER INFORMATION | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 5, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 2, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 29, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |