USPTO serial 73563523
METTLER LABWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with METTLER LABWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS F. REDDY
THOMAS F REDDY PENNIE AND EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 11036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | APPLICATION HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR WEIGHING SCALES AND BALANCES, NAMELY, CONNECTING CABLES, PROTECTIVE COVERS, KEYBOARD MASKS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS STORED WITHIN RECORDING MEDIA, AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD THEREWITH, FOR USE IN WEIGHING APPLICATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 12, 1989 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 17, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 11, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |