USPTO serial 73563931
CONCEPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONCEPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOEL I. ROSENBLATT
JOEL I ROSENBLATT HARRIS CORPORATION1025 W NASA BLVDMELBOURNE, FL 32919UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTEGRATED INFORMATION PROCESSOR NETWORK SYSTEM COMPRISING COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, AND PERIPHERALS | ABANDONED | Apr 30, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 2, 1987 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 5, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 12, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 24, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |