Drawing for OPTIQUE

USPTO serial 73564111

OPTIQUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTIQUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. R. HULBERT

W R HULBERTP O BOX 94ATLANTIC HWYLINCOLNVILLE, ME 04849

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003PERFUMES, COLOGNES, TOILET WATER; COSMETICS, NAMELY, PERSONAL ANTI-PERSPIRANTS; NON-MEDICATED PREPARATIONS FOR APPLICATION TO THE SKIN, OR SCALP; BATH SOAPS AND LAUNDRY DETERGENTS; ESSENTIAL OILS USED AS COSMETICS, HAIR SHAMPOO; DENTIFRICES, TOOTH CLEANING PREPARATIONS; BUBBLE BATH PREPARATIONS; TALCUM POWDER FOR TOILET USE; PREPARATIONS FOR THE HAIR; COTTON WOOL AND COTTON WOOL SUBSTITUTES FOR TOILET OR COSMETIC USE; FALSE NAILS AND FALSE EYELASHESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 23, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 7, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 26, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 21, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 3, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 31, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 26, 1987ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 27, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance