USPTO serial 73564111
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. R. HULBERT
W R HULBERTP O BOX 94ATLANTIC HWYLINCOLNVILLE, ME 04849| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMES, COLOGNES, TOILET WATER; COSMETICS, NAMELY, PERSONAL ANTI-PERSPIRANTS; NON-MEDICATED PREPARATIONS FOR APPLICATION TO THE SKIN, OR SCALP; BATH SOAPS AND LAUNDRY DETERGENTS; ESSENTIAL OILS USED AS COSMETICS, HAIR SHAMPOO; DENTIFRICES, TOOTH CLEANING PREPARATIONS; BUBBLE BATH PREPARATIONS; TALCUM POWDER FOR TOILET USE; PREPARATIONS FOR THE HAIR; COTTON WOOL AND COTTON WOOL SUBSTITUTES FOR TOILET OR COSMETIC USE; FALSE NAILS AND FALSE EYELASHES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |