USPTO serial 73564555
LUXMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1628944Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 1990
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LUXMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
OTA-KU, TOKYO, JP
OTA-KU, TOKYO, JP
OTA-KU, TOKYO, JP
TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ray Thomas, Jr.
Ray Thomas, Jr. Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.1030 15th Street, N.W.Suite 400 EastWashington, DC 20005-1503Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOUND REPRODUCTION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY - TRANSFORMERS, AMPLIFIERS, STEREO CIRCUIT TUNING APPARATUS, CHOKE COILS, ROTARY SWITCHES AND CHANNEL SELECTORS, KNOBS, MOULDED SOCKETS, LOUDSPEAKERS, PHONOGRAPH RECORD PLAYERS, AUDIO TAPE RECORDERS AND DECKS, PICK-UP CARTRIDGE ARMS, TOGGLE SWITCHES AND GRAMOPHONE MOTORS; VIDEO EQUIPMENT, NAMELY - VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS, TELEVISION MONITOR RECEIVERS, VIDEO DISC PLAYERS, COMPACT VIDEO DISC PLAYERS, SATELLITE BROADCASTING RECEIVERS; COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS THEREFOR; TELEPHONES; SOUND TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING APPARATUS; AND PARTS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QUANTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by QUANTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LUX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LUX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LUX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by E-LUX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LUXMAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 26, 2001 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 28, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Feb 21, 1997 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 26, 1996 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 25, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 2, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |