USPTO serial 73565247
CARBON FUELS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARBON FUELS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEE G. MEYER
LEE G MEYER5105 DTC PKWYSTE 317ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | COAL-DERIVED FUEL SYSTEMS AND FUEL COMPOSITIONS CONSISTING OF PARTICULATE COAL CHAR WHICH IS PELLETIZED WITH HYDROCARBON LIQUID AND BINDERS TO FORM A SOLID FUEL OR IS SLURRLED IN HYDROCARBON LIQUIDS AND/OR AQUEOUS LIQUIDS, WHICH SYSTEMS MAY BE SEPARATED TO YIELD A SOLID PARTICULATE CHAR PORTION AND A LIQUID PORTION, BOTH OF WHICH PORTIONS CAN BE USED AS A FUEL IN INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL COMBUSTION DEVICES; THE LIQUID PORTION CAN BE USED AS A REFINERY FEEDSTOCK OR IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CHEMICALS | ABANDONED | Jun 20, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |