USPTO serial 73565815
SUMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PROVINCETOWN, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GORDON NEEDLEMAN
P O BOX 201972 WASHINGTON STQUINCY, MA 02169Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WEARING APPAREL, NAMELY T-SHIRTS AND BASEBALL-STYLE CAPS | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 22, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 14, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 15, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 17, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 26, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |