USPTO serial 73569897
BODY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BODY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVE W. SEKERMAN
STEVE W SEKERMAN COOPER, EPSTEIN & HUREWITZ345 N MAPLE DR STE 200BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, JERSEYS, SHORTS, JOGGING SUITS, SWEAT PANTS, JACKETS, HATS, CAPS, SCARVES, GLOVES, FOOTWEAR, HOSIERY, NECKTIES, PAJAMAS, ROBES, NIGHT SHIRTS, THERMAL UNDERWEAR, HEAD BANDS, WRIST BANDS, SWIM SUITS, SWIM TRUNKS, SKIRTS, SHIRTS, SLACKS, TROUSERS, PANTS, JEANS, COATS AND JACKETS, SWEATERS, LEOTARDS, LEG WARMERS, STOCKINGS, SOCKS, PANTYHOSE, AND TIGHTS | ABANDONED | Aug 8, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 27, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |