USPTO serial 73570752
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERNEST A. BEUTLER
ERNEST A BEUTLER HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCEP O BOX NO 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48013UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL GOODS, NAMELY CHAINS, DRAIN PLUGS, TUBES, HOSES AND HANDRAILS FOR SHOWER STALLS | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | THERMOSTATS AND AUTOMATIC VALVES | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | MOUTH SPRAYS AND ATTACHMENTS THEREFOR | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | PLUMBING FITTINGS NAMELY WALL OUTLETS, TRAPS, ADAPTORS, REDUCERS, ELBOWS AND SWIVELS, FAUCETS AND SPOUTS, DRAIN OVERFLOW PIPES, SHOWERHEADS FOR HANDS OR PERMANENT INSTALLATIONS, SPRAY NOZZLES, TOILETS, MANUAL SHUT-OFF VALVES, DIVERTER VALVES, ELECTRIC LIGHTS, GLASS GLOBES FOR LIGHTS, EXTENSION HANDLES FOR FAUCET AND EXTENSION SPOUTS FOR FAUCETS, TRAPS, REDUCERS, ELBOWS AND SWIVELS SOLD AS A UNIT WITH FAUCET OR SHOWERHEADS AND VACUUM BREAKERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | SHELVES, VANITY, SHAVING AND WALL MIRRORS, PLASTIC HOOKS AND GRAP RAILS MADE FROM PLASTIC | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | ROLL-HOLDERS, SOAP DISHES, GLASSES AND HOLDERS THEREFOR, BRUSHES AND HOLDERS THEREFORE, WALL SUPPORTS, TOWELS HOLDERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 034 | ASHTRAYS | ABANDONED | — |
| 039 | ASHTRAYS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1993 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 9, 1989 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 1989 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |