Drawing for HANSGROHE

USPTO serial 73570752

HANSGROHE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HANSGROHE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERNEST A. BEUTLER

ERNEST A BEUTLER HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCEP O BOX NO 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48013UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL GOODS, NAMELY CHAINS, DRAIN PLUGS, TUBES, HOSES AND HANDRAILS FOR SHOWER STALLSABANDONED
009THERMOSTATS AND AUTOMATIC VALVESABANDONED
010MOUTH SPRAYS AND ATTACHMENTS THEREFORABANDONED
011PLUMBING FITTINGS NAMELY WALL OUTLETS, TRAPS, ADAPTORS, REDUCERS, ELBOWS AND SWIVELS, FAUCETS AND SPOUTS, DRAIN OVERFLOW PIPES, SHOWERHEADS FOR HANDS OR PERMANENT INSTALLATIONS, SPRAY NOZZLES, TOILETS, MANUAL SHUT-OFF VALVES, DIVERTER VALVES, ELECTRIC LIGHTS, GLASS GLOBES FOR LIGHTS, EXTENSION HANDLES FOR FAUCET AND EXTENSION SPOUTS FOR FAUCETS, TRAPS, REDUCERS, ELBOWS AND SWIVELS SOLD AS A UNIT WITH FAUCET OR SHOWERHEADS AND VACUUM BREAKERSABANDONED
020SHELVES, VANITY, SHAVING AND WALL MIRRORS, PLASTIC HOOKS AND GRAP RAILS MADE FROM PLASTICABANDONED
021ROLL-HOLDERS, SOAP DISHES, GLASSES AND HOLDERS THEREFOR, BRUSHES AND HOLDERS THEREFORE, WALL SUPPORTS, TOWELS HOLDERSABANDONED
034ASHTRAYSABANDONED
039ASHTRAYSABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 12, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 9, 1989CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jul 3, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
May 23, 1989NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED
Apr 24, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 30, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 14, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 10, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 1988UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Mar 1, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 31, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 8, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 19, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance