USPTO serial 73576153
GECO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERSKINE KATHRYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GECO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON, PRICE, HOLMAN & STERN400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | SEISMIC STREAMERS; AND AIR GUNS, GAS GUNS AND WATER GUNS FOR UNDERWATER SEISMIC EXPLORATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF SEISMIC EXPLORATION | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | DATA PROCESSING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF GEOPHYSICS | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF OIL EXPLORATION | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |