USPTO serial 73578001
COMPETITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROGERS, GERARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMPETITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NAGATA-KU, KOBE, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES L. ROWE
CHARLES L ROWE WOOD, DALTON, PHILLIPS, MASON & ROWENORTHWESTERN ATRIUM CTR STE 3800500 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | BICYCLE TIRES | ABANDONED | Nov 25, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 28, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 28, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 30, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 30, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 12, 1989 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 1, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 24, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 11, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 11, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 4, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |