USPTO serial 73578579
POSITIVE HARMONIC IMAGING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POSITIVE HARMONIC IMAGING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEVISION CAMERAS, TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY VIDEO TAPES AND CASSETTES; RECORDING DISCS NAMELY VIDEO DISCS AND DISC PLAYERS; PARTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1986 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1986 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |