USPTO serial 73579219
Serial No. 73579219
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 73579219?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID A. ROSE
DAVID A ROSE BUTLER & BINION1600 ALLIED BANK PLZHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | REPLACEABLE ELEMENTS IN DRILLING AND PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING RAM RUBBERS; BLOWOUT PREVENTER REPLACEMENT PARTS, NAMELY SNAP RINGS, RETAINER RINGS, SHAFTS, BEARINGS, O-RINGS, SPROCKETS, AND THE LIKE; PRODUCTION RUBBERS; DRILLPIPE WIPERS; RUBBER-COATED RING GASKETS; M&M ELEVATORS; DERRICK CLIMBERS; AND SCRAP RUBBERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |