USPTO serial 73579787
HYDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 27, 1990
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HYDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PERKINELMER OPTOELECTRONICS, INC.
WATERBURY, CT
FAIRFIELD, CT
ORANGE, CT
LOS ANGELES, CA
FAIRFIELD, CT
FAIRFIELD, CT
FAIRFIELD, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMIE FITZGERALD
KELLY L WILLIAMS EDWARDS & ANGELL LLPPO BOX 55874BOSTON, MA 02205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | GLASS ASPIRATORS, WHICH ARE PUMPS FOR THE DEFUSION OF GAS, AND GAS AND AIR MIXING ECONOMIZERS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF NEON TUBING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1981 |
| 009 | BUTYL PHTALATE PRESSURE GAUGES FOR MEASURING GAS PRESSURES IN NEON TUBING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1981 |
| 011 | GLASS STOPCOCKS, WHICH ARE FAUCETS FOR CONTROLLING THE FEEDING OF GAS INTO THE VACUUM SYSTEM OF NEON TUBINGS, GAS FIRED RIBBON BURNERS AND PARTS THEREFOR, GAS FIRED MULTICROSS FIRE BURNERS AND PARTS THEREFOR, SOFT FLAME CROSSFIRE BURNERS AND PARTS THEREFOR, ALL OF WHICH ARE EQUIPMENT FOR THE HEATING AND BENDING OF NEON TUBINGS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PERKINELMER OPTOELECTRONICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VOLTARC TUBES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LCD LIGHTING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MONTROY SUPPLY CO.
- Other trademarks owned by VOLTARC TUBES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VOLTARC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VOLTARC TUBES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named HYDE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 6, 2000 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 26, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 23, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 5, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 1989 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 1, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |