USPTO serial 73581109
NUM N
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUM N?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NANTERRE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM ANTHONY DRUCKER
12TH FL1111 19TH STWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | REAL TIME CONTROLLERS FOR MACHINE TOOLS AND ROBOTS; COMPUTERIZED NUMERICAL CONTROLLERS FOR MACHINE TOOLS INCLUDING SINGLE AND MULTIPLE SLIDE LATHES, TURNING CENTERS, MILLING MACHINES, MACHINING CENTERS, BORING MACHINES, GANTRY MACHINES, MACHINES FOR INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL GRINDING, GEAR CUTTING AND LASER CUTTING MACHINES; PROGRAMMABLE CONTROLLERS, COUPLERS AND CONTROL CARDS FOR THE SAME, VARIABLE SPEED CONTROLLERS FOR PINS, PIVOTS AND SPINDLES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |