USPTO serial 73581384
THE RUSHMORE FUND INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE RUSHMORE FUND INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENT COUNSELING AND BROKERAGE SERVICES | ABANDONED | Dec 4, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 22, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 1989 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 20, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 1988 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Sep 21, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 29, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |