USPTO serial 73581759
AL DENTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AL DENTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT G. WEST
LOTHROP & WEST ROBERT G W555 CAPITOL MALLSTE 1525SACRAMENTO, CA 95814Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | FOOD SAUCES, EXCLUDING APPLESAUCE AND CRANBERRY SAUCE | ABANDONED | Dec 20, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 6, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 16, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 27, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 18, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |