USPTO serial 73581903
SERAVAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SERAVAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID EHRLICH
DAVID EHRLICH WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN PC633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES, ENZYMES AND BIOCHEMICALS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS AND OF DIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1993 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |