USPTO serial 73582126
SULCUS TIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 1989
- Examiner
- ABATE CANDICE A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SULCUS TIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FORT COLLINS, CO
CANTON, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY LOUISE RYAN
MARY LOUISE RYAN COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY300 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | NOZZLES FOR ORAL IRRIGATORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 13, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 2, 1996 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 9, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 9, 1989 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 13, 1989 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 21, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 16, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 7, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |